Library of risk of bias tools

QUADAS

Study design(s) targeted by the tool Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studiesdiagnostic-test-accuracy-dta-studies
Additional details on designs NA
Tool area Health
Link to the tool Get the QUADAS tool

Details

Website https://www.bristol.ac.uk/population-health-sciences/projects/quadas/quadas-2/
Primary publication Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
Guidance document
Training

None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here.

Language English
Translations

None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here.

Record last updated 10/08/2023

Related tools and Publications

Previous versions

None

Updated versions

QUADAS-2; QUADAS-3

Related tools

None

Evaluations

Whiting PF, Westwood ME, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PN, Kleijnen J. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6: 9

Hollingworth W, Medina LS, Lenkinski RE, Shibata DK, Bernal B, Zurakowski D, Comstock B, Jarvik JG. Interrater reliability in assessing quality of diagnostic accuracy studies using the QUADAS tool: a preliminary assessment. Academic radiology. 2006 Jul 1;13(7):803-10.

Kaizik MA, Garcia AN, Hancock MJ, Herbert RD. Measurement properties of quality assessment tools for studies of diagnostic accuracy. Brazilian journal of physical therapy. 2020 Mar 1;24(2):177-84.

Other publications

None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here.

Key Criteria

Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality No
Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias No
Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) Yes
Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores Yes