Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studiesdiagnostic-test-accuracy-dta-studies |
---|---|
Additional details on designs | Comparative |
Tool area | Health |
Link to the tool | Get the QUADAS-C tool |
Details | |
Website | https://www.bristol.ac.uk/population-health-sciences/projects/quadas/quadas-c/ |
Primary publication | Yang B, Mallett S, Takwoingi Y, Davenport CF, Hyde CJ, Whiting PF, et al. QUADAS-C: A Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Ann Intern Med 2021;174(11) |
DOI | 10.7326/M21-2234 |
Guidance document | Get the QUADAS-C guidance |
Training | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here. |
Language | English |
Translations | |
Record last updated | 16/08/2023 |
Related tools and Publications | |
Previous versions | None |
Updated versions | None |
Related tools | |
Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
Other publications | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here. |
Key Criteria | |
Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | Yes |
Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | Yes |
Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | Yes |
Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | Yes |