| Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Mixed methodsmixed-methods Observational studies (mixed designs)observational-studies Randomized controlled trials (RCT)randomized-controlled-trial-rct |
|---|---|
| Additional details on designs | Mixed methods studies or multiple study designs |
| Tool area | Health |
| Link to the tool | Access the paper reporting the QATSDD tool |
Details | |
| Website | |
| Primary publication | Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Armitage G. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(4):746-52. |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01662.x |
| Guidance document | |
| Training | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here. |
| Language | English |
| Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here. |
| Record last updated | 04/06/2026 |
Related tools and Publications | |
| Previous versions | None |
| Updated versions | |
| Related tools | None |
| Evaluations | Paper reporting the tool also includes an evaluation of the reliabiltiy and validity of the tool. |
| Other publications | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here. |
Key Criteria | |
| Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | No |
| Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | Yes |
| Tool developed for use across topic areas (i.e. not developed for specific clinical area such as physiotherapy or dentistry) | Yes |
| Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | No |
