Revised JBI critical appraisal tool for cohort studies| Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Cohort studiescohort-study |
|---|---|
| Additional details on designs | |
| Tool area | Health |
| Link to the tool | JBI critical appraisal tool for cohort studies |
Details | |
| Website | https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools |
| Primary publication | Barker TH, Hasanoff S, Aromataris E, Stone J, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, Habibi N, Klugar M, Tufanaru C, Moola S, Liu XL, Munn Z. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for cohort studies. JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Aug 2. |
| DOI | 10.11124/JBIES-24-00103 |
| Guidance document | JBI manual: same guidance as in tool paper |
| Training | General to JBI checklist software youtube video: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools JBI critical appraisal youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muy7rEBVZ8Y&list=PL1f2FKzk8M6bsCzHbW7hyfAFJE3TUGBwD&index=29 JBI training courses: https://jbi.global/events JBI manual (same guidance as in tool paper): https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL |
| Language | English |
| Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here. |
| Record last updated | 10/01/2025 |
Related tools and Publications | |
| Previous versions | 2017 JBI Checklist |
| Updated versions | None |
| Related tools | The many JBI critical appraisal tools are listed here: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools |
| Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
| Other publications | JBI publications available on website: https://jbi.global/ |
Key Criteria | |
| Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | Yes |
| Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | Yes |
| Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | Yes |
| Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | Yes |
