Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Economic evaluationseconomic-evaluations |
---|---|
Additional details on designs | NA |
Tool area | Health |
Link to the tool | |
Details | |
Website | https://global.oup.com/academic/product/methods-for-the-economic-evaluation-of-health-care-programmes-9780199665884?cc=gb&lang=en& |
Primary publication | Michael F. Drummond, Mark J. Sculpher, Karl Claxton, Greg L. Stoddart, George W. Torrance. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed2015. |
DOI | |
Guidance document | |
Training | Two worked examples of the completed checklist are available from the book: Michael F. Drummond, Mark J. Sculpher, Karl Claxton, Greg L. Stoddart, George W. Torrance. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed2015. |
Language | English |
Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here. |
Record last updated | 15/08/2023 |
Related tools and Publications | |
Previous versions | None |
Updated versions | None |
Related tools | None |
Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
Other publications | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here. |
Key Criteria | |
Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | No |
Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | No |
Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | No |
Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | Yes |