Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Randomized controlled trials (RCT)randomized-controlled-trial-rct |
---|---|
Additional details on designs | |
Tool area | Health |
Link to the tool | de Vet Tool |
Details | |
Website | |
Primary publication | de Vet HCW, de Bie RA, van der Heijden GJMG, Verhagen AP, Sijpkes P, Knipschild PG. Systematic Reviews on the Basis of Methodological Criteria. Physiotherapy. 1997;83(6):284-9. |
DOI | 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66175-5 |
Guidance document | |
Training | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
Language | English |
Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
Record last updated | 24/05/2024 |
Related tools and Publications | |
Previous versions | None |
Updated versions | None |
Related tools | None |
Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
Other publications | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here.None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
Key Criteria | |
Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | No |
Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | Yes |
Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | Yes |
Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | No |