|Study design(s) targeted by the tool
|Additional details on designs
|Link to the tool
|Access the paper reporting the CHEC tool
|Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet HCW, van Tulder M, Ament A. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2005;21.
|Get the CHEC list guidance (Word document)
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here.
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here.
|Record last updated
Related tools and Publications
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here.
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here.
|Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality
|Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias
|Used in at least one review that none of the tool authors were co-authors on or is an update to a previously recommended LATITUDES key tool
|Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians)
|Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores