| Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Economic evaluationseconomic-evaluations |
|---|---|
| Additional details on designs | Health Economics |
| Tool area | Economics |
| Link to the tool | Access the paper reporting the CHEC tool |
Details | |
| Website | https://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/research/caphri/our-research/creating-value-based-health-care/chec-list-consensus-health-economic |
| Primary publication | Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet HCW, van Tulder M, Ament A. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 2005;21. |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0266462305050324 |
| Guidance document | Get the CHEC list guidance (Word document) |
| Training | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here. |
| Language | English |
| Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here. |
| Record last updated | 14/08/2023 |
Related tools and Publications | |
| Previous versions | None |
| Updated versions | None |
| Related tools | None |
| Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
| Other publications | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here. |
Key Criteria | |
| Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | No |
| Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | No |
| Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | Yes |
| Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | Yes |
