| Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studiesdiagnostic-test-accuracy-dta-studies |
|---|---|
| Additional details on designs | Clinical studies of radiologic examinations |
| Tool area | Health |
| Link to the tool | Access the paper reporting the Arrive tool |
Details | |
| Website | |
| Primary publication | Arrivé L, Renard R, Carrat F, Belkacem A, Dahan H, Le Hir P, et al. A scale of methodological quality for clinical studies of radiologic examinations. Radiology. 2000;217(1):69-74. |
| DOI | http://10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc0669 |
| Guidance document | |
| Training | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here. |
| Language | English |
| Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here. |
| Record last updated | 22/08/2023 |
Related tools and Publications | |
| Previous versions | None |
| Updated versions | None |
| Related tools | None |
| Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here. |
| Other publications | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here. |
Key Criteria | |
| Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | No |
| Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | No |
| Used in at least one review that none of the tool authors were co-authors on or is an update to a previously recommended LATITUDES key tool | Yes |
| Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | No |
| Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | No |
