|Study design(s) targeted by the tool||Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studiesdiagnostic-test-accuracy-dta-studies|
|Additional details on designs||Clinical studies of radiologic examinations|
|Link to the tool||Access the paper reporting the Arrive tool|
|Primary publication||Arrivé L, Renard R, Carrat F, Belkacem A, Dahan H, Le Hir P, et al. A scale of methodological quality for clinical studies of radiologic examinations. Radiology. 2000;217(1):69-74.|
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here.
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here.
|Record last updated||22/08/2023|
Related tools and Publications
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here.
None known – please contact us if you are aware of any publications that should be listed here.
|Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality||No|
|Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias||No|
|Used in at least one review that none of the tool authors were co-authors on or is an update to a previously recommended LATITUDES key tool||Yes|
|Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians)||No|
|Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores||No|