| Study design(s) targeted by the tool | Randomized controlled trials (RCT)randomized-controlled-trial-rct |
|---|---|
| Additional details on designs | |
| Tool area | Health |
| Link to the tool | paywall link to Detsky 1992 tool |
Details | |
| Website | |
| Primary publication | Detsky AS, Naylor CD, O'Rourke K, McGeer AJ, L'Abbé KA. Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Mar;45(3):255-65 |
| DOI | 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90085-2 |
| Guidance document | |
| Training | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any training that should be listed here |
| Language | English |
| Translations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any translations that should be listed here |
| Record last updated | 10/01/2025 |
Related tools and Publications | |
| Previous versions | None |
| Updated versions | None |
| Related tools | Some relationship to Chalmers score and Zelen system. See tool paper for details. |
| Evaluations | None known – please contact us if you are aware of any evaluations that should be listed here |
| Other publications | None |
Key Criteria | |
| Focuses on risk of bias, or makes a distinction between items that assess risk of bias and other aspects of study quality | No |
| Offers a method to reach either a domain specific or overall assessment of risk of bias | Yes |
| Tool development involving a range of stakeholders from different disciplines (e.g. methodologists, statisticians, clinicians) | Yes |
| Avoids recommending use of summary numerical quality scores | No |
